Hang on while we load the rest of the page...
 
 
breaking news

Teachers Strike Goes On For Third Day

Meeting starts off acrimoniously when union team claims D124 school board's attorney verbally attacked, teachers claim. Another round of contract talks scheduled for Thursday afternoon.

 

Evergreen Park elementary school teachers and professionals will head back to the picket line on Thursday, after contract talks broke up in the early morning hours following nine hours of deliberation.

Members of the Evergreen Park Federation of Teachers bargaining team met at Village Hall for a hastily called face-to-face sitdown by the D124 school board to discuss insurance—a major sticking point in contract talks.

The teachers and paraprofessionals from Dist. 124's five public grammar  schools have been on strike since Tuesday.

Sign up for Evergreen Park breaking news alerts for the latest strike coverage.

While some progress was made, the talks left a mark after the union’s bargaining team alleged that D124 school board attorney, Alan Sraga, verbally attacked the teachers.

“He began screaming at the top of his lungs at the team and being what we considered verbally abusive,” an angry Dave Comerford said, spokesman for the Illinois Federation of Teachers. “The teachers team should have gotten up and walked out, but to their credit they stayed.”

Comerford said he thought that major movement had been made but it did not come without a price. After what the union members claim was a verbal attack by Sraga, the teachers said they would no longer bargain in the same room with the school district board.

“Because of the attorney’s horrible behavior we won’t meet face to face with them,” Comerford said. “When it reaches the level when we’re so disrespected it takes away one more option.”

The federal mediator will now be going back and forth delivering offers and counter offers to each side.

“It’s not going to be forgotten,” Comerford added. “The worst part is that the board just let it happen.”

Both sides dealt in health insurance in an attempt to break the deadlock and move on to other contractual issues. Contract talks went two roads, with the teachers union making the last counter offer.

School board members’ called it quits for the night, saying they needed to “crunch some numbers.” The union's offer remains on the table until 5 p.m. Friday.

Another round of contract negotiations are scheduled to take place Thursday at 4:30 p.m., this time at Central Junior High School. The union’s bargaining team has agreed to break the picket line this evening to avoid having to drive to the federal mediator’s office in Hinsdale, while both sides hunt for another neutral venue.

Evergreen Park’s striking teachers are due back on the picket line at 6:30 a.m. today. American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten is expected to drop by in the early after to offer support to the teachers.

Asked if the Evergreen Park teachers strike was going to be nasty, Comerford said that it was starting to look that way.

“I’ve seen some bad ones in 16 years statewide, but I’ve never seen where were tonight meeting face to face,” he said. “It gets heated and insulting but not to tonight’s level. I don’t think people will understand how that is.”

Because of the late hour, calls could not be immediately placed to the school board or Sraga. Evergreen Park Patch will update the story later Thursday.

Read Patch's ongoing strike coverage:

Follow Evergreen Park Patch on Facebook and sign up for Breaking News Alerts

Related Topics: Contract, D124, Evergreen Park Dist. 124, and teachers strike

Concerned

6:34 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

So the EPFT wants me to believe that the LAWYER for the BOE "screamed" at the negotiating team during yesterday's session? That sounds so ridiculous, but thanks for the chuckle. The Patch needs to get to the bottom of this allegation, and the union supporters need to demand honesty from their representatives if you want this to move forward.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Southside

9:44 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

WGN and Fox must be wrong too because they reported it the same thing. Everything in the newspapers and TV is lies. Concerned knows all.

Comment_arrow

Bob

10:44 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

As you know, Southside, WGN and FOX weren't in the meeting, They're just going by what the union told them. Concerned may not "know all" but they sure seem to know more than you!

Comment_arrow

Southside

11:02 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Where is the board news conference? Why don't they talk? C'mon Bob. And I know a hell of a lot more than you.

Comment_arrow

Concerned

11:51 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Here's the Board's press release... if you go to the district website, you can click on the hyperlinks and view the attachments. Kudos to the board for providing this.

October 3, 2012 – 5:00 pm – October 4, 2012 at 1:20 am

The Board initiated a meeting with the Union. The Union requested that the meeting take place at a neutral site. Thanks to the Village and the EPPD for graciously offering meeting rooms, the use of a copier, and security. The meeting began with the Board’s request to review ground rules. Both parties then spent time sharing issues and interests. Both parties provided hand written proposals due to the absence of a printer. The Union presented a proposal on Insurance (attachment A), followed by further counterproposals from the Board (attachment B); the Union (attachment C), and the Board (attachment D). Due to the late hour and the need to access and examine additional data, the Board requested to recess the meeting until later in the day. The Union agreed to meet at Central Junior High at 4:30pm.
- Latest Board and Union Update 10/4/12

Comment_arrow

Sarah Rees-Consiglio

12:42 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Concerned, thanks for posting the link to the D124 supplied information. I logged on to do just that. Again, I urge everyone to read and critically evaluate the information issued by both parties.

Ed

6:35 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Wow these are adults that are working for our children, towards their futures. The more this goes on the more support the teachers and staff deserve. I don"t agree with the they said this or the other said that but fair is fair and some of these people are either at or below the poverty level with a family to feed trying to do things right. If Evergreen Park wants to continue to be a Police State I think it may be time to sell my house and go somewhere else and put my tax money into the future of my kids. That was one of the reasons I picked this community was the school system. After the last Superintendent and now the board, we are becoming a disgrace.and it may be time to go somewhere else. THANKS SCHOOL BOARD paid or not you were elected as my voice not your own.

Reply

EPresident

6:50 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Yep, the Boards Attorney yelling at the teachers, The Supt calling the Police on a group or parents. It is time to move and find a school district that wants to educate the studants, not punish the teachers. Remember half the board is up for election in April. I think it is time for a change.

Reply
Comment_arrow

jane

1:30 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

the disrespect towards this teachers union by the school board is insane. They should be ashamed of themselves

Tammy Hellman

6:59 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

I'm watching & reading all of what's going on very close because if this is how Teachers get treated I'm not sure my youngest will ever see the inside of an Evergreen Park school. It would be a little different if there wasn't a surplus of money. Work something out school board!!!

Reply

R Gibbons

7:35 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Concerned...I'm really sorry that you are doubting everything written and reported by the Patch. If you don't trust what the Patch is reporting then maybe you should write to the editor

Reply

EP Lover

7:38 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

We all need to remember that this is the version of events as reported by 1 of maybe 10 people at the table. Do we know that Dave Comeford is a credible source anyway? To date, the vast majority of the statements attributed to him are highly inflammatory and he may have other interests in mind (like his standing within the Union hierarchy) than those of the EP kids. I am certain that there is rancor between the board and the teachers. However, Mr. Comerford seems bent on exacerbating that discord rather than easing it. Respect goes both ways.

Additionally, I agree with others who say that the Patch should fully substantiate these type of claims before publishing the content as "news". In my opinion, the Patch team is sensationalizing the topic with this kind of reporting, very slanted headlines and poor verification of facts.

Reply
Comment_arrow

EP Lover

7:55 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Just as there have been calls for changes in the school board, I think that the Union should consider making changes in who represents them at the table. Clearly, the current team is not achieving the desired results and may be acting in a way that furthers divisiveness. I firmly beleive that both sides are to blame for this horrible, contentious situation.

CQM

7:43 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Teachers and supporters, you are an embarrassment to Evergreen park. Based on your own public behavior....I see you yelling, fist pumping and demanding. I'd call the police on you too. You look like a threatening, over induldged MOB. Tammy...the surplus is the taxpayers, it is there because thankfully there are some elected officials out there that govern in a fiscally responsible way. The surplus is to keep the school district from running into the ground AND continue to pay employees at a perfectly acceptable deal. Please do move! I cringe when I see my tax bill and the percentage devoted to SD 124 - thank God someone is finally saying no! I have never been so thankful that I chose not to use the EP school system, thanks to all the selfless catholic school teachers out ther that demonstrate a true vocation and set examples of what it means to be a responsible adults. Well, time for me to go to work now...in the real world...where people do not walk off there jobs and expect to still get paid or still have it!

Reply
Comment_arrow

EP Lover

7:57 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

CQM, I'm with you in that I'm really turned off by the rallies, mobs and other activities. Personally, I've avoided any of the picketing sites b/c I don't support the strike and actions of the staff (although I fully support a fair contract for them).

Comment_arrow

Southside

9:24 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Shame on you CQM for the nonsense you write. Last time I checked this is America, where you have every right to assemble, pump your fist, honk your horn, and/or yell outside. Union hasn't broken a single law. Sounds like you are one of those crazies who bother union police officers with stupid phone calls. And there isn't one Catholic school teacher who wouldn't take a union teacher salary and benefits if they had the chance. Glad you are not my neighbor.

Comment_arrow

tmn

10:32 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Southsider
The fist pumping and yelling may not be illegal but certainly exposing peoples children and families thereby creating safety concerns to somehow prove a a point should be. I think you are confused as to who the crazies are. And the point was the Catholic school teachers are not demanding and fist pumping..they are putting in the time and effort to educate children with out the nice benefits. And you prove CQM's point exactly. Who wouldn't take the union teachers salary and benefits!! That is exactly the reason why they should be happy with the deal they are given! Because it is so much more than many others get for their hard work everyday. Well stated southsider.

Comment_arrow

Southside

11:18 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

tmn, NO LAWS WERE BROKEN!!! What safety concerns come with fist pumping? Why do so many Catholic teachers supplement their income with other jobs? I see that first hand. No teacher should have to work 2 jobs. Everyone tells me it is a good deal. My household couldn't make it on their average salary. Not many teachers driving around in Ferraris. Teachers didn't create this recession, but they sure are being told to pay for the politicians' and Wall Street's mess. They deserve better.

Comment_arrow

tmn

12:01 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Southside...ummmm, fist pumping doesn't create potentially dangerous situations does, putting personal phone numbers on signs does.....Guess I should of spelled that out more CLEARLY for you since you were unable to connect the dots from the overall conversation regarding the behavior displayed by the picketers. And there are many people that supplement their incomes with second jobs, certainly the work ethic in my home growing up. Yep, best scenario would be for no one to have to seek out a second job, myself included. However, many of us have to take on that burden and make ends meet while working a 12 month year, and getting home well past evening hours. Get real. Teachers didn't create the recession as the vast majority of people who haul off to work everyday didnt either. The taxpayers of EP deserve the chance to speak to how their hard earned taxes are spent.

Comment_arrow

mamadontplaythat

9:34 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Southside, are you serious? 1. Why would you throw in "union" police officers like they are going to be biased to the teachers case and not do their job or something? 2. "and there isn't one catholic school teacher that wouldn't take a union teacher salary and benefits if they had the chance" Obviously, if they wanted that they WOULD be a union public school teacher but for some people it isn't all about the money or benefits, they just love to teach and that is why they CHOOSE to stay in catholic schools.

R Gibbons

7:48 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

No you are an embarrassment to yourself to be so closed minded. You truly have no idea what teachers do.

Reply
Comment_arrow

SC

3:30 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

We all have an idea what teachers do! This is the lamest response and I am tired of hearing about it. A lot of people in EP have labor intensive, demanding jobs and are exhausted when we get home at the end of a long day. The difference is we don't continuously whine about it and expect sympathy because of the jobs we have selected. I am an RN. It is demanding, both emotionally and physically. And once again, I would never just walk out on my patients. This strike is ridiculous, the same as the CPS strike. You are all replaceable. Show up to work and do your job, or find a new career.

Concerned

7:54 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

It looks to me like a the union wanted a reason to call in the big dogs so they could justify their six figure salaries. These discussions should be recorded to protect the reputations of those involved.

Reply

R Gibbons

7:59 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

And if you truly did use the catholic school system you definitely don't reflect their teachings of tolerance and understanding. I AM a lifelong resident and a product of the parochial and public school system here. So if you don't like the taxes etc then you maybe must consider taking your own advice CQM!! Enjoy your new home. I only wish you peace and tranquility!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Concerned

8:56 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

So now we are questioning people's religious beliefs because they express an opinion on here? What next?
This is really getting out of hand... civility should be the word of the day.

Comment_arrow

Southside

9:29 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Hey Concerned, if you write something here, you are fair game. What some people are writing here is pure garbage. Questioning teachers' integrities is no different than questioning a persons values and beliefs. You all seem to know everything. Run for office. Fix it.

Comment_arrow

tmn

11:30 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

R Gibbons
Actually the Catholic School system teaches the principals of social justice and benefits of hard work and sacrifice. a concept that is sadly lost on some and replaced by greed and selfishness. Perhaps you should bestow tolerance and understanding towards others who take a different view point other than your own. If someone takes the view that a certain level of salary and benefit is appropriate based on numerous reasonable factors, how does that make them not tolerant or understanding? Just foolish.

Comment_arrow

Concerned

11:42 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Hey Southside, if you want to make a difference commenting on here, stick to the issues and the facts. To do otherwise could be construed as an attack, and only contributes to the hostility. I think we have enough of that already.
I would also dismiss any poster that questions teacher's integrities, but very little of that is showing up here. Most of us are defending the board because it is fiscally prudent for our village. Nothing personal about that opinion.

EP Lover

8:01 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

R. Gibbons - maybe I don't know what you do. However, I also don't know what nurses, policemen, construction workers, firefighters, stay at home mothers, farmers, ministers and other highly respected occupations do on a daily basis either. There are many 'laudable' occupations and in my opinion, teachers are not entitled to any special benefits - despite the EP Union's insistance that they are.

Reply

CQM

8:18 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

RG. Luckily I saw this before I leave for work in the real world. Just an FYI, none of your posts every really state a fact or intelligent, articulate thought. You just attack. Hopefully, you are not a teacher! And just to clarify, I think there are teachers who work extremely hard, as others work just as hard in their walk of life. Likewise, I'm sure there are teachers that are not so great, as with any other profession. What I object to is the sense of entitlement, the refusal to take an offer that is fair in today's economy, an offer that draws from a system I support with my paycheck. I credit elected officials who strive to be fiscally responsible and fair to the tax payer. A masters degree does not necessarily mean you are the best at what you do. Most people are paying more fore their healthcare, I am, so why should I want to fund your deal? And as a graduate of Loyola University, a Jesuit institution, I don't think any one could accuse me of being closed minded! And please don't tell me you don't know what I mean by that!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Southside

9:38 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Hey world!!! CQM graduated from Loyola and says board's offer is fair. What was everyone thinking? Game over. CQM for president of Earth. Go Ramblers because you are CQM!!!

Taxpaying Parent

8:22 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

I am very saddened to hear and see with my own eyes that the Board members personal home numbers have been shared not just with EP residents, which is acceptable, but on 95th street on picket signs that have been photographed with the news and shared on the internet. I understand the union needs to get the information out to EP residents, but not anyone who drives down 95th street or reads about this issue online.
Just because the Union may have the right, doesn't make it right. As a parent of D124 with faith, I pray to God that he protect the board members and their families from any harm that may come. I pray that God soften the hearts of the union presidents and the union members to remove that information off the signs on the busiest street in the community. Some of the board members have children and they attend D124 and did not run for this, their parents did. Information on where you live, names, families are quickly found off the internet with a home number. I pray for quick resolve for both parties as I do not like the way this is going.

Reply

R Gibbons

8:46 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Actually CQM my posts have referenced facts. And if you truly are a graduate of Loyola you would know how to research yourself to find quantifying facts. And no I am not a teacher but if you truly read my posts I have already stated my background. Best of luck to you!!! :)

Reply
Comment_arrow

nooneyouknow

10:22 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Thanks for finding that info, Concerned. Interesting that the Comerford (and even Pajeau, in most cases) makes more than our principals do.

Comment_arrow

KB

8:53 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

This means nothing. These people are not on the level of teachers. They are no different than the higher ups that run the companies everyone else works for. They are not public employees. What do their salaries have anything to do with what’s going on. You mine as well post the salaries of all the bosses of every company in the nation and hate on them too. Nice try though.

Comment_arrow

Concerned

10:17 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

KB - Union leaders most certainly are public employees. Where do you think the money comes for their salaries? First I (the "public") pay my property tax, then a large portion of that goes towards the public schools in my district. The district then allocates a large portion of what they receive to pay teachers salaries. The union then takes their cut, it the form of dues. They then use that money to pay handsome salaries to their leaders. Oh, and even more insulting to me, they use all the rest of their dues to contribute to politicians who will then do their bidding for them, most of which I would never vote for myself. The union backed guys usually win, because how can an opponent make up for the kind of money they contribute? How is that for taxation without representation for you? Read what President FD Roosevelt had to say about public sector unions. He knew it was an unholy alliance even back then.

Comment_arrow

KB

6:37 am on Friday, October 5, 2012

Concerned,
So you are claiming that that because teachers take a portion of their salary to pay dues that it turn pay for the salaries of the Union Officials, that makes the Officials public employees? That is idiotic. If that were the case, the supermarket where the teachers buy their groceries, the gas station where they buy their gas, the clothing store where they buy their cloths, are all publicly funded because the teachers use their salaries to buy good from them which pays their employee’s salaries. Union officials are not public employees. Teachers have every right to take their money they earn, and spend it whatever way they want, and that doesn’t mean the tax dollars are funding the people/places/organizations where they spend it. 124 teachers do not, by law, have to give any union any money. It is their choice to do so. They can choose to join another union if they want, or be an independent teachers organization. Please, go to the school proposed budget on the district website, look under the ESTIMATED DISBURSEMENTS/EXPENDITURES, and tell me the total money they project will go towards union representation for the teachers this year. You apparently have no idea what being a public employee means.

EP Lover

9:06 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Very interested Concerned. So Dave Comerford makes approximately $128K annually. Wonder if his compensation is tied to the financial impact of the contracts he negotiates. In other words, the higher the dollar value of the contract, the more compensation he receives. I don't know if that is the case but it is certainly something to consider.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Southside

10:29 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Wonder if Bush was behind 9/11? Wonder if the Mafia killed Kennedy? Wonder if Elvis is alive? I don't know if that is the case, but it is certainly something to consider. Conspiricy in EP!!!

Comment_arrow

EP Lover

11:24 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Southside, questioning the motivating factors of the Union is fully appropriate - just as many have publicly questioned the Board's motivation.

If anyone has more info on the Union's process works, I'd love to hear it.

tmn

9:06 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

R Gibons
Seems CQM is right. Haven't seen you refer to one fact yet. Sounds like CQM is very well researched and well versed. How sad you would infer that CQM may not of actually graduated from Loyola. I think that particular comment speaks volumes about you . 'nuff said.

Reply

Linda Panico

9:06 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

This is a message to the Co-President’s of ED D124 IFT Union: Mrs. Anzelmo and Mrs. Newquist,
I am the sister of a board member and more importantly, the aunt of three children who live with her. I am so disappointed that the Union has directed their members to post her phone number along with the rest of the board members names and phone numbers on their picket signs. I understand your right to picket during this strike. I implore you to use better judgment during these contentious times.
You say this strike is for the good of the children of Evergreen Park. Are the board members children excluded from your protection? Please remember that ANYONE driving down 95th street can see their phone numbers. I want you to think about this: you are putting their children’s safety in jeopardy. I promise you that my nieces did not get asked their opinion of their mom’s desire to be a school board member, or the rest of their children. These are hard times for people and I am not sure that you have completely thought out the ramifications of this tactic.

Continued into next post....
Aunt Linda Panico

Reply

Linda Panico

9:07 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Continued...
Mrs. Anzelmo-I know you are a deeply Christian person with strong moral convictions, who would be devastated to look my sister in the eyes and apologize because some random unstable person decided to take your cause in their own hands at the expense of my innocent nieces, due to a phone number on a picket sign. Please take their names and phone numbers off your signs so that you can live with a decision that did not impact children who are not elected officials. I am hopeful that both sides will all value the children’s needs first and put them back into the classroom where they belong.

Thank you,
Aunt Linda Panico

Reply

nooneyouknow

9:31 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Home phone numbers on picket signs?! Truly despicable.

Anyone with judgment that poor has no business being in any position of authority, least of all one involving children.

Reply

R Gibbons

10:01 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Personal information should NOT be given out in these matters. I agree with the consensus on this page regarding this issue!!

Reply

tom

10:09 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

I watched in amazement to see the union's paid spokesman claim that the union was hurt and disrespected by the lawyer during a negotiation session. I was at the last Board meeting where the teachers yelled and screamed for over an hour at the Board for their raises. The Board did not shout back they had to sit there and take the abuse I do not know how they did it. This union tactic see to be a bit shallow.

Reply

Cathleen

11:40 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012

It drives me crazy when people cry about their tax dollars going up for the local school system. I want my tax $ going to schools over, say, a lawsuit against nuns or a lawsuit to try and seize someone's property via eminent domain. We have a mall that is bringing in very little, and nothing has been done to fix it. We have big box stores coming in that are probably getting huge tax breaks from the village. Once the local school system goes, the neighborhood goes too. No one wants to move to an area w/poor public schools. The realty is that most people cannot afford private education. It's sad for someone to imply that because a teacher chooses, for whatever reason, to work for less $ at a private school, that teacher is somehow more dedicated than one who works for a public school.

Reply

Cathleen

12:02 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

That should be "reality"...and I attended private school for 12 years.

Reply
Comment_arrow

tmn

12:28 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Cathleen,
Not much dedication when you walk out and leave your students in the dust....Lawsuit against nuns? Really?? As you speak to what damages property values, you may want to consider how an over sized hulking building with open access to a girls high school encourages higher property values. As you stated, sure there are many dedicated public school teachers, ones who are willing to hash out a labor agreement while there students remain in school. And looking over the comments, it seems you have missed the point...there are many who work every day, and struggle the same expenses and costs...but dont get to walk out on their jobs and then expect to get paid for doing so.

Comment_arrow

R Gibbons

11:02 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Cathleen - very good points. Thank you for your comments.

CQM

12:57 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Let me rephrase for those that want to continue to deflect. I have no respect for any one that walks off their job and still expects to be paid for it, especially, with 8.3 unemployment. You are dedicated to yourself when you do that. Children should not be used as bargaining chips, the onus is on the teacher...you left your job. The tax base is a limited entity, and therefore your demands need to have limits. The surplus exists because of responsible governing, and I am thankful for that...it exist because someone is saying no...again, why should health care costs go up for me and most people I know but yet I'm expected to fund your demand. No way.

Reply
Comment_arrow

R Gibbons

10:41 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

You sound like "Bob". Are you "Bob"?

J. Doyle

1:26 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Dr. Machak made it very clear at the impromptu meeting yesterday that there have been no "face to face" meetings between the two sides in quite some time. Therefore, why is Mr. Cumerford now announcing to the media that the school board and school union are now unable to meet face to face? Furthermore, from what I understand, both sides were heated in their discussion, with the union doing just as much shouting as the district's attorney. This is a very volatile time. For everyone.
The teacher's union has proudly stated, both verabally and in print, that they are doing this for the kids. Quite frankly, no, you're not. If this were being done in the best interest of my children, you would be negotiating in the afternoons and evenings and teaching during the day. If this were being done in the best interest of my children, you would not have spent the last month involving my children in your agenda and inviting them to join you on a picket line. If this were being done in the best interest of my children, you would be practicing the good behavior you strive to achieve through the PBIS curriculum, not screaming on street corners about our friends and neighbors needing to be overthrown because you are not getting what you want. If this were being done in the best interest of my children, you would be better examples of how to behave in a crisis situation. You would behave calmly, fairly,and be capable of seeing both sides of a situation.

Reply
Comment_arrow

daniel m

2:30 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Thank you. Whatever sympathy the teachers could be gaining is getting destroyed because of all their grandstanding. I know it's "the union way", and although it is not illegal, it is completely the wrong message the educators should be bringing to the kids. Thank you again, J. Doyle, for one of the most reasonable comments here.

Comment_arrow

Southside

3:43 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

By the tone of your sarcasm, you are obviously against the people who teach your children. They worked over a month into the school year while they worked and waited for a deal both sides could agree on. How long are they suppose to wait? They were insulted before they ever struck on Facebook and in these comment pages after every story. That is not rumor but fact. Every time they speak someone cries lies. They are professionals who deserve a lot better than they've been given. They are not in school right now but the board doesn't meet them till late afternoon? Why isn't the board working around the clock to resolve this? And if you think the board shouldn't budge and teachers should be unhappy at work, than you care the least about you kids' education.

Comment_arrow

J. Doyle

7:25 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

My previous comment was in no way meant to be seen as sarcastic. On the contrary, I am completely behind the teachers of my children. I have lived in EP for 12 years and have always been unfailingly supportive of the teachers. I have tried to remain unbiased for the past 6 months as I have sat at schoolboard meetings listening to both sides of a very explosive situation. That being said, in response to "how long were they suppose[d] to wait," there is no clear answer. For as long as it takes, I guess. I believe they should have waited until a decision was reached that was acceptable to both sides. I believe if they want to be treated as professionals, they need to behave as professionals AT ALL TIMES when in the public eye, and that has not been the case. It is NOT professional to devote hours of instructional time a week inviting other people's children to walk a picket line. Likewise, it is NOT professional to walk away from your job in the middle of it-- for any reason. If they deserve more than they are being given, then they need to be respectful of the children they are affecting with this work stoppage, because they certainly deserve more than they are being given! The ramifications of this strike will be far reaching and felt by everyone for a long time to come. Today was supposed to be the 8th graders step-up day at the high school. Tuesday was supposed to be basketball try-outs at CJHS. How will our kids be compensated for those losses?

Comment_arrow

J. Doyle

7:43 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Furthermore, the teachers chose to not be in school right now. The schoolboard, as elected volunteers, do not have that luxury. They are also all professionals, but they have chosen to work said jobs during the day and take care of schoolboard business in the evenings, as I believe the teachers should also have chosen as their course of action. I think that would have been respectful on both sides. I have certainly not said that the schoolboard shouldn't budge; I think there is room to move on both sides.
Additionally, I have maintained a civil tone as I have shared my opinions throughout today on this forum. DO NOT question my devotion to the education and well being of my children. If their teachers are unhappy at work, there are options available to them: stick it out and negotiate with the schoolboard until an acceptable compromise can be reached, or quit your job and find a new one. I believe those would both have been professional.

Comment_arrow

R Gibbons

11:10 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

JDoyle - they did! And they are! And they are within their rights in this great country to strike.

Cy

1:39 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

As a father and the husband of a Board member I would also please ask that the teachers take our phones number off picket signs. If possible can the Patch also remove the video link?
Thanks,

Reply
Comment_arrow

EPresident

1:53 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

The signs with the numbers were parents and students earlier today, when I went past Central.

Comment_arrow

Resident of EP

3:04 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

I support your request. No one should be doing this. The parents made an error, if they are, in fact, responsible. The leaders of the strike should have to approve all signage. This never should have been allowed. I'm sorry for you and your family and thank Kathy for her work on our district's behalf.

Cy

1:53 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

sorry for the typo - meant to say our phone numbers.

Cy Rohan

Reply

Resident of EP

3:00 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Common ground exists amongst all of us. We care about our children, our schools, our community, our real estate values. Surely everyone can stand together to reach a fair and equitable agreement.
There is good news:
Look at the union's offer (Attachment C) and the Board's offer (Attachment D on the d124 website) and you will see they are nearly identical. There are only two differences: the board wants a 4 year contract, the union 3. And the board wants the PPO family insurance to be at 65/15% contributions beginning in 2014, while the union prefers to keep it to 70/30. The two sides are so close, surely an agreement can be reached.

Reply
Comment_arrow

nooneyouknow

3:17 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

I agree that the progress on insurance is good news, but keep in mind that there are still several unresolved major issues. I will be very surprised - but pleasantly so! - if the kids are back in school by Tuesday.

Comment_arrow

Resident of EP

3:38 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

Yes, you are correct, an agreement about all 3 issues (salary, pension and health insurance) is what we need. However, last night's proposed contract by the union was the first time it changed its health insurance offer since August 30th. This is major movement on the union's side and I give them credit for having made it. I also give the board credit for having moved toward the union's latest proposal.
The union's last offer that addressed salaries did not tie salary raises to CPI, which seems to be a very important thing from the board's perspective. However, the salary issue didn't look to be that far apart, either.
The biggest bridge to be built here seems to be in the pension category, specifically, the severance payments and health insurance payments for retirees.
Let's stay positive. Both sides have moved their positions substantially. Thank you to both sides and keep working on it. You can reach an agreement. Despite the rancor you are getting there. Bring your best selves to the tables, both sides take a deep breath, and your contract will be settled.

Mike Fitzpatrick

6:48 pm on Thursday, October 4, 2012

as someone who know this lawyer, his behavior does not surprise me at all-- he's just a bully. good lawyers don't need to resort to that kind of behavior-- but wait-- he's paid by the hour- so it's in his best interest to not get a settlement- what? wait? does that make any sense?

Reply

Concerned

8:11 am on Saturday, October 6, 2012

@KB... Of course union leaders aren't "public employees", but the sole source of union income (that I know of) is from teachers salaries, which are paid with tax dollars. A teacher paying money to the union is different than them going to buy shoes because the union is a lobby! They actively work to get candidates elected who will help them move their own agenda forward. The unions agenda is not my agenda, and yet there is no recourse for me. I have to continue paying my taxes, and those dollars will get filtered through the teachers to the union. It's not like a business where you can not purchase their product or service if you don't like where they donate a portion of their profits (remember chick fil a?). Who is representing me as to how my tax dollars are spent in the union?

Reply

Concerned

10:21 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

I think it's time to let the EPFT know that the silent majority exists, contrary to what you may think after reading the above article. Please continue to email the board (d124.org) with your support, but now also send an email to epft124@gmail.com.

Reply
Comment_arrow

EP95

10:18 pm on Wednesday, October 17, 2012

That piece is a riot, thanks for the laugh!

Leave a comment

 
 
 
 

Your town. Mobilized.

Download Patch for iPhone or Patch Places for Android.

Learn more 

Own a local business?

Stay in touch with customers by claiming your free Patch listing.

Learn more 

Advertise on Patch

Build community trust in your local brand with game-changing tools for any budget.

Learn how